So, if I'm not accurate in reasons or reading, than I don't take the blame. I don't slave labor to find info, stalk, or get on my knees and beg. If info isn't delivered in a decent, humanitarian way, who do you think you are for me to even want to invest the time in your abuse?
All I see on the cover of today's msn is: Nets are the biggest losers with the #5. I could be wrong, but I think they connect it to Ian Freeman's 5th video clip of the meeting that I posted not too long ago. I have no idea why they call him a "safety net." If I had an assured choice of someone that would love me back, my number one choice right now would be Ian Freeman. I think that is the most simplest, basic foundation that anyone should have in their relationship: acceptance. His main gist that I have a strong connection with is his humanitarianism. It is not hating on people when they express themselves. Promotion for libertarians. Help for the oppressed. I can't believe they are calling him a loser over that, that is so wrong.
A false sense of security is staying in a relationship that is abusive instead of leaving. That is when security is a bad thing.
Unless Ian has a history that I don't know about where he is responsible for abusing me in some way, than I see no reason to call him a safety net. I love myself and accept myself for who I am. I'm not looking for anyone who wants to change me or be controlling over me because I think differently. It is the perfect love. Its not competition, it's not codependency, its not trophy wife. Personally, I think people are mad that I don't prove myself to them and am more concerned with what he could be thinking. Like I've said and already proved with how life simply happens, I don't need a man to be who I am. At the same time, if I find someone I care about, then yes, I treasure and care about what he thinks. I think in any relationship there will be compromises and changes, but if I ever get in a relationship, that is for us to decide as should be for any couple. I think people are just pissed that we don't need anyone's validation. That we can think for ourselves.
I don't completely know him, but after seeing hints of him throughout the matrix, I am very drawn to him and want him. With the words that he represents, I wouldn't mind at all if he watched over me. Like I said, I don't know him enough to know if his actions back it, but a man who's actions and heart truly matches his words, I would trust and accept to watch over me. Any other man, I havn't had a choice with and havn't given consent to.
So Ian, It sucks big time that you're getting hated on. It pisses me off. Screw them all, I still want you.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment